Recommended reading on what Web 3.0 isn’t and why:

Stowe Boyd: Jason Calacanis on Web 3.0

I personally feel that Web 2.0 has a long way to play before we can advocate jumping onto some new wave. Have we seen the full culmination of the social revolution going on? No, and I think it will be awhile before we do.

Personally, I feel the vague lineaments of something beyond Web 2.0, and they involve some fairly radical steps. Imagine a Web without browsers. Imagine breaking completely away from the document metaphor, or a true blurring of application and information. That’s what Web 3.0 will be, but I bet we will call it something else.

Tim O’Reilly: Today’s Web 3.0 Nonsense

… There’s definitely something new brewing, but I bet we will call it something other than Web 3.0. And it’s increasingly likely that it will be far broader and more pervasive than the web, as mobile technology, sensors, speech recognition, and many other new technologies make computing far more ambient than it is today.

But in any event, the next meme to take hold will be broad based, with many proof points, each showing another aspect of the discontinuity. Anyone who says his startup is the sign of this next revolution is just out of touch.

I find myself particularly irritated by definitions of “Web 3.0″ that are basically descriptions of Web 2.0 (i.e. new forms of collective intelligence applications) that justify themselves as breakthroughs only by pretending that Web 2.0 is somehow about ajax, mashups, and other client side technologies.

So there you have it. What we need is better imagination, and less of the versioning.

Btw, Stowe had another nice article on the social graph meme that’s currently making its rounds: Dave McClure Is Wrong, Continued: Social Graph v Social Network

One Response to “Dememefication”

  1. Dimitri Lisitski Says:

    I think there is a clear cireteria for Web 3.0. There is no Web 3.0 until we have seen the burst of Web 2.0 bubble :)